Di sampaikanpada
Workshop NasionalPembelajaran PMRI Untuk SMP/MTs
Di Hotel Inna Garuda
Yogyakarta
13 sd 15 Nopember 2009

By :Marsigit, M.A
Reviewed by :SitiNuruniyah/09301241023

As we have seen, Realistic Mathematics emphasizes the construction of the context of concrete objects as a starting point for students to acquire mathematical concepts. Concrete objects and environment objects can be used as a context for learning mathematics in building mathematical connections through social interaction. Concrete objects manipulated by the student within the framework of efforts to support students in the process matematisasi concrete to the abstract. There are two kinds matematisasi, namely: (1) matematisasi horizontal and (2) matematisasi vertical.

By doing the observations and analysis on the VTR on learning mathematics, which has recorded a teacher who has been carrying out realistic approach to learning mathematics, the other teachers were able to test and find alternatives to the development of ideas about concrete objects and objects lingkungans ekitar can be used as a context learning of mathematics in building mathematical connections through social interaction. A mathematical model of learning that has been recorded in the VTR certainly has its advantages and disadvantages. So teachers can discuss it to gain new knowledge by comparing the experience. The VTR itself also has drawbacks, such as: the limited point of view, not all aspects can be recorded, image quality, image capture moments that are not appropriate.

The use of VTR learning math with realistic approach can be
sebagaiberikut benefits:
1. Teachers have the opportunity to test the concrete objects and obyekobyek
Environment can be used as a context of learning mathematics in building mathematical connections through social interaction.
2. Teachers have the opportunity to explore and reflect on learning math concepts realistic.
3. Teachers have the opportunity to exchange experiences with other teachers about the development of realistic mathematical learning.
4. Teachers have the opportunity to reflect on the preparation of teaching and learning process (PBM) in junior high school mathematics in accordance with the principles of PMRI
5. Teachers have the opportunity to reflect on the development of learning resources for teaching and learning process (PBM) in junior high school mathematics in accordance with the principles of PMRI
6. Teachers have the opportunity to reflect on the development of assessment activities for teaching and learning process (PBM) in junior high school mathematics in accordance with the principles of PMRI


Disampaikanpada:
SEMINAR NASIONAL PENELITIAN DAN PENERAPAN MIPA
FMIPA UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA
1 Agustus 2006

By :Marsigit, M.A
Reviewed by :SitiNuruniyah/09301241023 

Tingkat diskusi filosofis memiliki karakteristik seperti kebutuhan untuk cross-check serta membandingkan dengan beberapa titik pandangan independen, untuk membangun teori umum dari yang berkaitan. Untuk mencapai tujuan, penulis menggunakan beberapa pendekatan filosofis seperti interpretasi, internal coherences, idealisasi, perbandingan, analogi dan deskripsi.
  Teori kasih sayang ganda adalah upaya klasik untuk menyelamatkan kesadaran persepsi dari apa yang diduga menjadi inkonsistensi mencolok (Gram, SM, di
Werkmeister, W.H, 1975). Menurut Kant,
terpengaruh oleh sesuatu' adalah efek dari pengalama objek pada fakultas representasi (ibid, hal. 29). Kant menyediakan dua jenis benda yang mempengaruhi subjek: 'hal dalam diri mereka sendiri' ada yang mempengaruhi diri, dan 'penampilan dalam diri mereka sendiri' ada yang bertindak atas sensibilitas kita dan independen dari karakteristik apapun melekat pada reseptor sensorik kami
(Werkmeister
, W.H,1975)
Apa yang dapat kita pelajari adalah bahwa harus ada hubungan lain antara 'hal dalam diri mereka sendiri' dan kasih sayang. Kant menegaskan bahwa 'ruang' dan 'waktu' adalah bentuk-bentuk perasaan kita; apa yang mempengaruhi kepekaan kita adalah sebuah benda yang memiliki 'ruang' atau 'duniawi' karakteristik yaitu objek aphenomenal.
Penelitian ini telah memberikan peneliti wawasan ke dalam peran yang berbeda dari kesetiaan epistemis dan aksesibilitas bahan pembelajaran fisik. Para peneliti berpendapat bahwa kesetiaan epistemis diperlukan untuk mengajar aman didasarkan konsep dengan model, sedangkan aksesibilitas mempromosikan keterlibatan kelas kaya.


DipresentasikanPada Seminar Nasional
PENELITIAN, PENDIDIKAN DAN PENERAPAN MIPA
UNIVERSITAS NEGERI YOGYAKARTA
30 Mei 2008

By: Marsigit, M.A
Reviewed by: SitiNuruniyah/09301241023

Research is an activity to gain knowledge called science, carried out with certain procedures that are systematic and supported by a methodology which is an assessment of the rules in his method. Teachers or prospective teachers of mathematics as a researcher can deliberately make changes in teaching mathematics in schools by conducting various experiments; so comes the scientific method. Approach to mathematics education research can be done by barbagai way, among other quantitative research. Quantitative research considers that learning mathematics is objective and measurable.


Circumstances and effort uncovering the phenomenon of learning mathematics can be described by a circle hermenitik where a teacher or a researcher trying to uncover aspects of learning mathematics as a symptom or phenomenon in the form of facts that can be observed directly and form of the potential for development that requires treatment. Hermenitik circle in mathematics education research provides full awareness to the researchers that the learning of mathematics and its components are not sterile, but is associated or connected with various aspects and contexts of learning both in time and in time telahl ampau now is the time for the continuity of learning.

The scope of mathematics education research can come from a push by penelit to reform mathematics education; in which the unconscious bahwai novation mathematics education can be sourced to the factor-facto conceptual, value, pragmatic, empirical and political.

Ebbutt and Straker (1995: 60-75), gives his view that in order for potential students can grow and learn mathematics in an optimal, assumptions about the characteristics of the subjects and impikasi students towards learning mathematics is given as follows: Students will learn math if they possessed the motivation, with implications for research and learning that teachers need to: provide a fun activity, attention keinginansiswa, build understanding through what is known by students, creating a classroom atmosphere that supports learning activities, provide activities that correspond with learning objectives, provide challenging activities, provide activities that provide expectations of success, valuing each student achievement.

With the study of mathematics education we can know the difference
Individually or in groups in the study of mathematics, we can determine the position of students in a group, can compare learning outcomes between groups. We also can do a match between goals and results hasi lbelajar; whether the standard of competence or competence dasa rtelah achieved? Research results can be used for refining the program, counseling, provision of information to the public. Besides that we also can do a comparison between the performance and criteria for each dimension of the program and refining the program and the inference results of mathematics education as a whole.